If you run a UK competition or raffle website, Meta ads are the single biggest growth lever you have. They are also the platform most likely to suspend your account, throttle your spend, or reject your creative without warning.

Most articles in this space stop at “get your RMG licence.” That is step one. The hard part starts after Meta approves you.

This guide is the playbook we use to run paid acquisition for UK competition sites. It covers what Meta actually classifies as Real Money Gaming, the real cost per purchase we have paid across our client accounts, the creative formats that approve and convert, and the account warming process that decides whether your launch works or stalls.

Every number in this article is real, and from our own ad accounts.

Run A Profitable Competition Website

Want these numbers running through your own competition site? We run paid acquisition for UK operators alongside the build. Same team, same data, same playbook.

Talk to us about your competition site →

The state of Meta ads for UK competition sites in 2026

Meta treats UK prize draw and competition websites as restricted under its Online Gambling and Games policy. That puts you in the same bucket as casino sites, betting platforms, and lottery operators, even though a properly structured UK prize competition is none of those things.

The practical consequence is twofold:

• You need an RMG (Real Money Gaming) onboarding application approved before any of your ads will run reliably.
• Even after approval, Meta treats new accounts with extra caution for the first 30 to 60 days.

Most UK operators discover this after their first ad gets rejected. Some give up. Some go through the RMG application and assume that is the end of it. Most then find out their ads still are not delivering full budget, and nobody can tell them why.

The honest answer: RMG approval is the entry ticket, not the finish line. The first 60 days are about warming the account, building delivery history, and giving Meta enough signal to trust your spend.

What Meta classifies as Real Money Gaming (and why approval is only step one)

Meta’s Online Gambling and Games policy covers:

• Real money gaming and gambling
• Lotteries
• Sports betting
• Daily fantasy sports

UK prize competition websites do not fit any of those categories cleanly. A properly structured competition with a free entry route and a genuine skill question is not gambling under UK law. We have a full breakdown in our guide to whether you need a gambling licence for a competition website.

Meta does not always make that distinction. Their automated systems flag prize content, payment processing tied to chance, and certain creative elements (prize photography with money references, draw-style language) as RMG. Their human reviewers then either approve you under the RMG framework or reject you outright.

The fix is the RMG onboarding application. You submit:

• A legal opinion letter from a UK solicitor confirming your operation is lawful under UK law
• Your registered business details
• Your website URL
• Operator and contact information

Meta typically responds within one to two weeks. We have seen approval as fast as seven days and as slow as 21.

Here is the bit nobody talks about: approval does not equal full spend. We had a client whose RMG was approved on 14 April 2026. By 21 April, a week later, their £25 per day budget was still spending below threshold. The account was approved, the creative was approved, but Meta was still throttling delivery.

That is normal. We cover why in the account warming section below.

Real cost benchmarks: what we have actually paid

Two client accounts, two different niches, real data.

A UK cars and cash competition client

468 purchases attributed to Meta ads.

• Blended cost per purchase across all ad sets: £2.65
• Best performing ad set: £1.33 cost per purchase

This is from a warm and retargeting funnel running primarily talking-head video with popup elements.

A UK luxury competition client (new account, April 2026 launch)

85 purchases attributed to Meta ads in the first 35 days of a new ad account.

• Blended cost per purchase across all ad sets: £5.04
• Best performing ad set: £3.20 (final day urgency push)
• Total ad spend: £428.56
• Total reach: approximately 29,580
• Total impressions: 45,368

What these numbers tell you

The luxury client data is recent and reflects a brand new account in the first 35 days of trading. The cars and cash account is more mature, with established delivery history and a refined creative library.

A few things you should take from this:

• A blended CPP between £3 and £8 is normal for UK competition websites in the first 30 to 60 days.
• The best ad sets sit around £1.30 to £3.30 once you find them.
• Cars, cash, and high mass-appeal prizes typically beat luxury verticals on CPP, but luxury verticals usually have higher ticket price and higher margin per purchase.
• Final day urgency converts harder than ongoing campaigns. Our best performing ad set on the luxury account was a single day push on a competition ending that night.

If your CPP sits above £15 with no improvement after 14 days, something else is wrong. Usually it is the offer, the landing page, or the audience targeting, not Meta itself.

The 3-layer funnel we run for every client

We do not run one campaign and hope. Every client account is structured in three layers.

Layer 1: Retargeting

Audience: people who have visited your website in the last 30 days but have not purchased.

Budget: £3 to £5 per day to start, scaling as the warm pool grows.

Goal: lead capture or purchase. Lower CPL target (under £15) than cold.

This layer warms the account. It teaches Meta which of your visitors actually buy, builds your conversion event volume, and gives the algorithm the data it needs to optimise cold campaigns later.

Layer 2: Warm commercial

Audience: people who have engaged with your commercial pages, pricing pages, or past competition pages.

Budget: scales with results. Usually £20 to £100 per day per client at maturity.

Goal: purchase.

This is where our six validated video scripts live. Walkthroughs of what is included, case studies from named clients, ownership angle, and the reasons operators choose us over locked-in competitors.

Layer 3: Cold prospecting

Audience: lookalikes of past purchasers, plus broad interest-based targeting (often seeded from the GOV.UK Voluntary Code signatory list for prize draw operators).

Budget: only deploy once Layers 1 and 2 are producing reliable conversion data.

Goal: scale.

Cold prospecting is the most expensive layer and the slowest to mature. Most UK competition operators try to start here and burn budget before the account has any data to optimise on.

The order matters. Retargeting first, warm second, cold third.

Creative formats that work for UK competition sites

We have tested every major creative format on UK competition and raffle websites. Here is what consistently approves and converts.

Talking-head video with popups

A single presenter speaking directly to camera, with text overlays and animated popups reinforcing the key points (prize value, ticket price, draw date, winners).

This is our default format. It approves easily, holds attention longer than carousels, and feels authentic to UK competition audiences who are used to live draw content on Facebook and Instagram. If you are also running organic content, see our guide to running a Facebook Live draw for content that feeds back into your retargeting pool.

Case study video

A client tells their story on camera. What they were doing before, why they switched to a competition site, what happened after. Strong material includes:

• A UK beauty and lifestyle competition client (£30,000 revenue in the first month post-launch)
• A UK luxury competition client (sold out their first competition, launched in 20 days)
• Russell Diggin at Rusboy Competitions (£4.5M year one, 40,000 active players)

Static comparison graphics

Side by side comparisons in carousel format. Examples we have tested:

• “Everything included” checklist
• “Them vs us” platform comparison
• “Day 1 vs day 90” client outcome timeline

These work well in feed and Stories at 1080×1350 and 1080×1920.

Formats we have stopped running

• Pure prize photography with no presenter or story. High CPM, low engagement, gets flagged by Meta more often.
• Screen recordings. Less engaging than talking-head, and harder to repurpose across placements.
• Heavy promotional language (“WIN NOW”, “GUARANTEED TO WIN”). Often rejected, and the language reads as gambling, not skill-based competition.

Six video scripts we have validated

The hook is everything. If you do not stop the scroll in the first two seconds, the rest of the script does not matter. The structures below are the ones we use across every Layer 2 video.

1. “What’s in every package”. Opens with: “We do not do stripped-down cheap options.” Frames pricing transparency upfront.
2. “20 days deposit to live”. Opens with our 20-day launch case study. Speed as proof.
3. “The process”. Walkthrough of working with us, not technical detail. Removes friction for buyers worried about complexity.
4. “Growth and marketing”. Opens with Russell Diggin at Rusboy Competitions (£4.5M year one, 40,000 active players), then a beauty client at £30,000 first month. Outcomes as proof.
5. “You own it outright”. Ownership versus SaaS and locked-in agencies. Anti-platform-lock-in angle.
6. “Why us vs competitors”. Partnerships, Voluntary Code signatory status, seven-days-a-week support team.

Every hook leads with an outcome, an objection, or a specific number. None lead with a feature.

Pixel and Conversions API setup for WooCommerce competition sites

A working Meta Pixel and Conversions API setup is non-negotiable. Without it, Meta cannot optimise toward your buyers, your lookalikes are weak, and your reporting underestimates real CPP by 30 to 60 percent.

Here is the configuration we deploy on every WooCommerce build.

Pixel events (browser side)

• PageView (every page)
• ViewContent (competition pages)
• AddToCart (entry added)
• InitiateCheckout (checkout started)
• Purchase (entry completed)

Conversions API (server side)

Mirror the same five events server-side. This catches users who block browser tracking (iOS 17+, ad blockers, privacy modes) and gives Meta a complete signal.

Match quality matters. Send hashed email, phone, first name, last name, and customer event source URL with every event. Meta uses these to match conversions back to ad clicks even when the cookie has been blocked.

What to skip

• Do not implement the Lead event on a checkout page. Use Purchase. Lead is for top-of-funnel email capture, not for ticket buyers.
• Do not double-fire events from both Pixel and CAPI without deduplication. Use event_id matching to prevent inflated reporting.

If your build is with our team, this is configured by default on every site we deliver. If you are working with another agency, ask them to send you a Test Events screenshot from Events Manager showing both Pixel and CAPI firing matched events with deduplication confirmed.

Account warming and spend limits in the first 60 days

This is the section nobody else writes. Real data, real account.

A UK luxury competition client we launched in April 2026 began running Meta ads on 13 April. The RMG application was submitted around the same time and approved approximately 14 April.

Their “Competitions Audience Data” ad set was budgeted at £20 per day. Across 35 days that is £700 of intended budget. Actual spend: £54.56. That is £1.56 per day on a £20 per day budget. Meta delivered 8 percent of the intended budget.

Meanwhile, the same account’s “Brand Awareness” ad set, budgeted at £5 per day, spent £141.87 across the same 35 days. That is £4.05 per day, hitting 81 percent of the intended budget.

Same account. Same warming period. Different budgets. Meta throttled the higher-budget ad set proportionally harder.

When we spoke to Meta’s support team about this, the answer was direct. They were spending cautiously because three things on the account were new:

1. The ad account
2. The Facebook page
3. The payment card on file

The three new entities triggered Meta’s protection mechanism. The advice from Meta was to leave the account running and let it warm.

That is exactly what we did. Over the following weeks, delivery opened up.

What to do during the warming period

1. Start budgets low. £5 to £15 per day per ad set. Higher budgets get throttled harder, not faster.
2. Run continuously. Pausing and unpausing resets warming progress. Once it is live, leave it.
3. Hit your daily budget every day. Meta needs delivery history. Underspending one day does not roll over.
4. Drive conversion events. Meta needs to see Purchase events to trust your optimisation. The more, the faster the warm-up.
5. Do not change the payment method. Adding a new card mid-warming restarts the trust clock.
6. Keep the same Facebook page. Switching pages mid-flight resets ad delivery learning.

Expect 30 to 60 days of warming before the account behaves normally. Some accounts warm in two weeks. Some take three months. Patience pays.

When and how to scale past £50 per day

Once your account has delivered consistently for 30 days or more, your CPP is stable, and your Purchase event count is above 50 per week, you can begin scaling.

The rules we follow:

• Increase budgets by no more than 20 percent every three days. Larger jumps reset learning and often spike CPP for a week.
• Duplicate winning ad sets rather than scaling them. A second ad set at the higher budget protects the original from learning reset.
• Scale audiences before scaling budget. New lookalikes and broader interest sets give Meta room to grow without re-targeting fatigue.
• Watch for a re-review. Sudden spend increases can trigger a manual Meta review. Keep the account in good standing (no policy violations, no recent rejections) to clear it quickly.

Our highest spending single-day ad set on that luxury client account ran £150 per day for a one-day final day urgency push, with a £3.20 CPP across 24 purchases. That is the right way to deploy a high budget on a warm account: short window, clear urgency, audience that already knows you.

Voluntary Code advertising requirements and how they shape creative

Nera is a signatory of the DCMS Voluntary Code of Good Practice for Prize Draw Operators. The Code has been in effect since May 2026 and applies to most legitimate UK prize draw and competition operators.

The advertising-relevant requirements:

• No misleading prize claims. If your headline prize is a car worth £30,000 and you imply a winner is “guaranteed”, you are non-compliant. ASA and Meta both enforce this.
• Free entry route must be visible. Your ads should not push paid entry without making the free postal entry route accessible somewhere reachable from the landing page.
• Age and self-exclusion language. Eighteen plus required. If you operate self-exclusion (which you should), the route to opt out must be findable.
• Responsible play messaging. Where appropriate, especially for high-value prizes, you should not encourage excessive entry.

These shape ad creative in three ways:

1. Hooks based on guaranteed wins or “free money” are out. They fail ASA, Meta, and the Voluntary Code simultaneously.
2. Case study led creative outperforms hype led creative for compliance and conversion both.
3. Voluntary Code signatory status is itself a trust signal. We feature it on landing pages and reference it in our “Why us vs competitors” video script.

Full breakdown of what compliance looks like in practice in our Voluntary Code clause by clause guide.

The bottom line

Meta ads work for UK competition websites. The numbers we have shown are real, repeatable, and within reach of any operator who runs the right structure. Russell Diggin at Rusboy Competitions ran the same playbook to £4.5M of year-one revenue with 40,000 active players. The 3-layer funnel works at scale.

The biggest mistakes we see:

• Starting with cold prospecting instead of retargeting
• Setting high budgets before the account is warm
• Treating RMG approval as the end of the process instead of the start
• Running prize photo carousels instead of talking-head video
• Ignoring pixel and CAPI setup until reporting looks wrong